Q16: Learning,Forgetting, Re-Learning...

-
Question: How do you know you have learned something? 

You definitely have not learned something just because you did well on an academic style exam which 'tested' your knowledge of the subject.  Beyond that, this question is ridiculously hard to answer.  A subject of philosophers and educational academics throughout the ages...

Broadly, just to offer some thoughts on the subject, I think you need to ask what it is you are trying to learn.  Is it an applied life-skill?  A fine-motor skill? A piece of information? An equation or a formula? What?  Because in each of these different cases, having learned that something will look different.  

If it is a piece of information, you have learned, or at least learned of it, the first time you come across it.  If your asking how you know when you will remember it, that's highly individual.  I know I will remember something if I repeat it enough, or if it had a major impact on my life, or if it is a piece of information that is so completely useless that to not remember it would be absurd.  

If it is a formula or an equation, then frequent 'testing' in the sense of seeing if you still know it ought to tell you when you remember it.  To know if you have learned it you should do two things: be able to manipulate it, and be able to explain it in simple terms. 

But I think the question probably has life lessons, faith issues, and applicable skills in mind.  That is where it all falls apart.  As I shared in this post, I thought I knew about organizational change, but then I found out how wrong I was.  So when did I learn it? When I had the head knowledge?  When I had some experience? Or have I still not learned those lessons?  I know I will make mistakes again in the future in this area... does that mean I haven't learned this stuff? 

If you are asking when you know you will not make that mistake again, or when you will finally understand issue/person X, then I am going to go with... never.  You will always make mistakes again.  That confusing person will not suddenly become clear; even if you get to a point you think you understand them, they will change.  

One of my favorite concepts, which seems to be nearly universally applicable, is that of the hermeneutical spiral (ok, not really universal application, but it comes up a lot).  Hermeneutics is the art of interpretation.  As a word it is used particularly of understanding biblical, and ancient, texts.  However, the idea of the spiral can be easily broadened.  

Let me explain it in brief.  When we approach a subject (no matter the nature of the subject), we do so with a pre-understanding.  We come with already formulated ideas and beliefs.  Then, we interact with the subject on the basis of that pre-understanding. As we do so our understanding is altered, which allows us to come to a deeper understanding.  Lather, rinse, repeat. 


This process continues and we spiral towards the ever elusive 'true understanding' (which, philosophically speaking, we never quite reach).  You can add words like dialogue, experience, and practice to this process, but I think you get the idea.  

Incidentally, discovering this about your spouse is one of the things which makes marriage such a fun and amazing experience; there is always more to learn, more to know, more to understand.  Of course it also opens the door to ever new stupid mistakes, but that's OK.  For Kristina, to get to know her better and love her more, I would taste foot every day!

So, we spiral towards the truth.  You can picture it as a journey spiraling up to the top of a mountain, it's misty heights lost in a fantasy landscape far above your heard.  Or, you could picture it as a being flushed down the world's biggest toilet.  Personally, I would go with the former. 

Comments

PakG1 said…
Alexander Pope! :)
2:29 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forgiveness: A Hard Word From Luther

-
"Those who follow Christ grieve more over the sin of their offenders than over the loss or offense to themselves. And they do this that they may recall those offenders from their sin rather than avenge the wrongs they themselves have suffered. Therefore they put off the form of their own righteousness and put on the form of those others, praying for their persecutors, blessing those who curse, doing good to the evil-doers, preparing to pay the penalty and make satisfaction for their very enemies that they may be saved. This is the gospel and the example of Christ." - Martin Luther (Quoted by Miroslav Volf, Free of Charge, pg. 161-162)
Read more

Proper Confidence: Faith, Doubt, and Certainty

-
Image
Leslie Newbigin, Proper Confidence: Faith, Doubt , and Certainty in Christian Discipleship. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans, 1995. 105 pgs. In this gem of a book Newbigin takes the reader on a journey away from the idea of Cartesian certainty and towards a more proper scaffolding for thought and belief. He denies the possibility of ideal certainty with no doubt and concludes that seeking this ideal can only to skepticism (of an extreme sort) and Nihilism. The thesis of this book might best best be stated as follows: the proper confidence of a Christian is not the possession of indubitable knowledge but the confidence of one who has heard and answered God's call of 'Follow me.' In order to demonstrate this point, Newbigin first examines three 'paths' whose titles, which are his first three chapter titles, seem somewhat counter-intuitive. In the first chapter, 'Faith as the Way to Knowledge,' Newbigin argues that if knowledge, and God, are ultim
Read more

A Good Tree Bears Good Fruit....

-
Image
"Every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit." - Matthew 7:17-18 "One of the most powerful ways to influence the behavior of a system is through its purpose or goal. That's because the goal is the direction-setter of the system, the definer of discrepancies that require action, the indicator of compliance, failure, or success toward which balancing feedback loops work. If the goal is defined badly, if it doesn't measure what it's supposed to measure, if it doesn't reflect the real welfare of the system, then the system can't possibly produce a desirable result. Systems, like the three wishes in the traditional fairy tale, have a terrible tendency to produce exactly and only what you ask them to produce. Be careful what you ask them to produce." - Donella H. Meadows, Thinking in Systems. 
Read more